First Half of Pet Reflection

 Ruth Owusu

 Dr. Juniper Ellis

 Postcolonial Literature 

First Half of Pet Reflection 

    Pet is such an oddly confusing yet intriguing book. The earlier chapters of the book caused me to be very confused and left with unanswered questions. However, once I kept reading and getting towards the halfway mark, the plot began to become more and more clear to me, especially in relation to angels and monsters. I was having many light bulb moments in the scene of Jam and Redemptions when they video-called each other (Emezi, 97). In the picture book that Jam had the Angels were said to look like monsters. Everything we think is bad may not be in appearance; however, in action, it's terrible. So we have to be watchful. The angels in their criteria of monsters show that monsters were not a monolith in appearance. It was in actions that made them dangerous...a "monster." It is ironic that angels who appear pretty and angelic are quite ugly. I guess it's true what they say that "ugly meet ugly." In the early chapter, Bitter makes reference that monsters don't look like anything in particular, which is why Pet must be right in its mission. In the case of Redemption, the monster may be a family member who is allowing themselves to do evil or cause evil for someone. Therefore, Pet must be an angel. Who knows! 

    I am curious about the latter half of the book in search of Jam and Redemption going to the library to find a criteria that angels used in determining who were monsters or not.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LaValle Reflection

Adeyemi 2nd Weekly Reflection

LaVelle Reflection, We Travel the Spaceways