Pet pt.1 reflection

 Elizabeth Thompson

Dr. Ellis

EN 376

15 November 2023

Inner Monster

            Pet is initially described by Jam’s parents as a monster, and he takes offense to that. Yet, he assumes a protective role over Jam while her parents fight and reprimands them saying, “Are you not ashamed, are you not full of shame, see how shameful you shamelessly shout about me being here, not once thinking if your child was safe, without noticing her, you shame things, where are your eyes, they are not clouded by shame, but maybe they should be” (47).

            In a single breath, a single sentence of run-on clauses, he berates them with authority. They become the cowering child they have made of Jam. There is a strange dynamic between Pet and the parents, especially Bitter, his creator. Is Pet Bitter’s inner monster taken form via her outlet of painting? Is Pet even a monster if only some humans are monsters? Pet is made with and of Bitter’s hands. Is he her creation or a part of herself, and what does it imply that Jam was the one who gave life to him? What does it imply that Pet is the one to shame Bitter? Pet seems to have some kind of relation to Bitter’s psyche in his protectiveness of Jam and use of Bitter’s reasoning at moments. He has no eyes, but he tells Bitter her eyes are unclouded by shame although they maybe should be. How does Pet perceive or navigate the world? Does his lack of eyes make him an objective witness? Perhaps he cannot see because Bitter does not want the monstrous parts of herself to be witnessed. Perhaps he takes offense at “monster” because ultimately, he is still a part of Bitter that loves Jam, and that love is not monstrous and ugly.

            It will be interesting to see how Pet interacts with Bitter in the future and whether or not his presence will be productive or destructive to the psyches around him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LaValle Reflection

Adeyemi 2nd Weekly Reflection

LaVelle Reflection, We Travel the Spaceways